<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pasadena Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net</link>
	<description>Politics aren't always rosey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:18:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#8220;&#8230;your community may not receive its fair share.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/03/09/your-community-may-not-receive-its-fair-share/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/03/09/your-community-may-not-receive-its-fair-share/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Riojas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to working on a project, I have not been posting much.  However, I thought I would post this picture of a letter I received today from the US Department of Commerce.   I redacted the address information for privacy reasons.
Spread the wealth.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/03/09/your-community-may-not-receive-its-fair-share/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So&#8230; What do You Know About Secretive Donation Sites?</title>
		<link>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/02/16/so-what-do-you-know-about-secretive-donation-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/02/16/so-what-do-you-know-about-secretive-donation-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Riojas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alarmism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enviroment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Individual Rights vs The State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While driving home, I heard an interesting advertisement proposing to raise money to fight against Meg Whitman for California Governor.  It made me think of several things, one of them the recent Supreme Court Decision finally allowing US Corporations to enjoy their Second Amendment Rights and the Revelations that Anthropomorphic Climate Change is Junk Science [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/02/16/so-what-do-you-know-about-secretive-donation-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Republican&#8217;s are the Party of No is a lie</title>
		<link>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/02/16/the-republicans-are-the-party-of-no-is-a-lie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/02/16/the-republicans-are-the-party-of-no-is-a-lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 03:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Riojas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simple Commentary and Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/?p=243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any claim that the first year of Obama&#8217;s Presidency and agenda was stalled by the Republican&#8217;s being Partisan or the &#8220;Party of No&#8221; is simply an untruth.    The reason is quite simple: even if the Republican&#8217;s wanted to obstruct, the Democrats in both the House and Senate held enough of a majority to blast any [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/02/16/the-republicans-are-the-party-of-no-is-a-lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ARE You Good Without God?</title>
		<link>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/02/11/are-you-good-without-god/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/02/11/are-you-good-without-god/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Riojas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is actually a very good question.
The answer to the question has everything to do with perspective.
For the Atheist, the answer is simple because by default they rule out anything greater than nature.   But the answer becomes more complicated depending on your belief system.   Since it is often against Christianity that the Atheist pits his [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/02/11/are-you-good-without-god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Quip:</title>
		<link>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/02/11/quick-quip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/02/11/quick-quip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 03:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Riojas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simple Commentary and Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/?p=235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a certain irony in that Liberals claim to take from those with more to give to those with less and yet when they themselves have more give little of their own.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/02/11/quick-quip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Think the President&#8217;s Speech Spoke for Itself</title>
		<link>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/01/29/i-think-the-presidents-speech-spoke-for-itself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/01/29/i-think-the-presidents-speech-spoke-for-itself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Riojas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It did.   Anyone listening will have heard his common mixed message where he first sounds a conservative tone then contradicts it.
I will say this:  most of the current woes are Bush&#8217;s fault in-so-far as he signed the Legislation Obama and other Democrats Voted for.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/01/29/i-think-the-presidents-speech-spoke-for-itself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And With the Democrats, Nothing Changes.</title>
		<link>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/01/26/and-with-the-democrats-nothing-changes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/01/26/and-with-the-democrats-nothing-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Riojas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honestly, if Obama focuses on anything, it is guaranteed to fail.  Instead of changing their strategy to take into account the Conservative Brown victory in Massachusetts, they are doubling down on their far from spend-thrift agenda.  Instead of cutting costs, they are giving away money which, while nice, does nothing to generate income.   Which brings [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/01/26/and-with-the-democrats-nothing-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Censorship</title>
		<link>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/01/23/censorship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/01/23/censorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Riojas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most everyone will be aware that this week, the Supreme Court recognized that Corporations are covered by the 1st Amendment.   There are some very good discussions here and here.   But I will add this: &#8220;As long as I&#8217;m your President, I&#8217;ll never stop fighting to make sure that the most powerful voice in Washington belongs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/01/23/censorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Republicans can Lose Their Advantage</title>
		<link>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/01/21/how-the-republicans-can-lose-their-advantage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/01/21/how-the-republicans-can-lose-their-advantage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Riojas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simple Commentary and Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there is one thing the Republican Party needs, must, has to learn from Massachusetts is that Conservatism is a winner.  If Scott Brown ran as a Moderate, ran as McCain ran, he would have lost.   Why?  Because people know that a man of conviction would not run as middle of the road; would not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/01/21/how-the-republicans-can-lose-their-advantage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brown Wins, The Nation Rejoices!   Coakley Loses, The Elite Plot.</title>
		<link>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/01/19/brown-wins-the-nation-rejoices-coakley-loses-the-elite-plot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/01/19/brown-wins-the-nation-rejoices-coakley-loses-the-elite-plot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Riojas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The good news, for the majority of the Nation, is that Scott Brown appears to have won the Senate race in Massachusetts.    This is good news as it means the Health Care &#8220;Reform&#8221; bill is defeat-able.    The down side is that we will see just how determined those who want to see it&#8217;s passage become.   [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pasadenapolitics.net/2010/01/19/brown-wins-the-nation-rejoices-coakley-loses-the-elite-plot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
